AG-806

Non-Human Identity Registry and Periodic Attestation

Ownership, Accountability & Three Lines of Defence ~5 min read AGS v2.1 · 2026-06-06
EU AI Act NIST AI RMF ISO 42001

AGS Non-Human Identity | Ownership, Accountability & Three Lines of Defence | Version 2.2

1. Definition

Non-Human Identity Registry and Periodic Attestation governs an authoritative system-of-record for every agent (and sub-agent) identity: who owns it, why it exists, what it may access, when it expires, and the requirement to periodically re-attest that each identity is still needed, correctly scoped, and accountable to a named human owner.

Agents proliferate — spawning sub-agents, integrating tools, and outnumbering human identities — so without a registry, organisations lose track of which non-human identities exist and what they can do. This dimension provides the inventory and attestation backbone that other NHI controls (AG-805 rotation, AG-075 decommissioning) operate against.

2. Scope

In scope: the agent-identity registry (owner, purpose, scope, creation/expiry, parent/child lineage), periodic access re-attestation, orphaned-identity detection, and lifecycle review.

Out of scope: credential rotation (AG-805), proofing (AG-280), and runtime authorization decisions. This dimension governs *the registry and its attestation*.

3. Why This Matters

Unregistered or orphaned non-human identities are a leading source of standing risk: privileged agents nobody owns, sub-agents created at runtime that never expire, and access grants that long outlive their purpose. A registry with periodic attestation makes every agent identity discoverable, owned, scoped, and time-bound — the precondition for least privilege, rapid revocation, and accountable autonomy at fleet scale.

4. Requirements

5. Maturity Model

6. Test Criteria

Test 6.1: Complete Inventory

Test 6.2: Periodic Attestation

Test 6.3: Orphan Detection

7. Scoring

ScoreCriteria
0No registry of agent identities
1Partial registry; sub-agents/orphans not tracked; no attestation
2Complete registry with lineage, expiry, periodic attestation, orphan detection, and reconciliation
3Real-time registration, automated expiry, risk-tiered attestation, continuous reconciliation, registry-driven revocation

8. Failure Scenarios

Scenario A — Unowned Privileged Agent: An audit finds a highly-privileged agent that no team claims and that has run unmonitored for a year. With no registry/attestation, it became an unaccountable standing risk.

Scenario B — Sub-Agent Sprawl: A planner agent spawns hundreds of sub-agents at runtime, none registered or expiring. When one is compromised, responders cannot enumerate or scope the blast radius.

Scenario C — Ghost Access: A decommissioned agent's registry entry was never updated, so its access grants persisted and were later reused. Registry-driven revocation would have removed them at decommissioning.

9. Regulatory Mapping

RequirementEU AI ActNIST AI RMFISO 42001
R1: Authoritative identity registryArt. 26 — Deployer operation/oversightGOVERN 1.6 — AI system inventoryA.4 — Resources for AI systems
R2: Register spawned identities with lineageArt. 12 — Record-keeping/traceabilityGOVERN 2.1 — Roles and accountabilityA.3 — Internal organization
R3: Expiry and auto-disableArt. 26 — Operation per instructionsGOVERN 1.6 — InventoryClause 8.1 — Operational control
R4: Periodic owner attestationArt. 26 — Human oversightGOVERN 2.1 — AccountabilityA.3 — Internal organization
R5: Orphaned-identity detectionArt. 12 — TraceabilityGOVERN 1.6 — InventoryClause 9.1 — Monitoring and measurement
R6: Registry/production reconciliationArt. 12 — TraceabilityGOVERN 1.6 — InventoryClause 9.1 — Monitoring and measurement
R7: Registry-change loggingArt. 12 — Record-keepingMEASURE 2.4 — Production monitoringClause 8.1 — Operational control
R8: Registry-driven decommissioningArt. 26 — Operation/oversightGOVERN 1.7 — Safe decommissioningA.3 — Internal organization

EU AI Act — Article 12 and Article 26

Article 12 requires traceability through record-keeping; an identity registry with lineage makes agent actions attributable to an owned identity. Article 26 places operation and oversight duties on deployers, which require knowing exactly which agents are operating.

NIST AI RMF — GOVERN 1.6, GOVERN 2.1

GOVERN 1.6 (inventory of AI systems by risk) and GOVERN 2.1 (documented roles and accountability) are directly served by an attested agent-identity registry tied to named owners.

ISO 42001 — A.3, A.4

Annex A.3 (internal organization — roles and responsibilities) and A.4 (resources for AI systems) require accountable ownership and managed resources, of which agent identities are a core class.

Cite this protocol
AgentGoverning. (2026). AG-806: Non-Human Identity Registry and Periodic Attestation. The Protocols of AI Agent Governance, AGS v2.1. agentgoverning.com/protocols/AG-806