The Standard
The 841 Dimensions Regulatory Mapping Version History Assurance Framework
Compliance
Compliance Leaderboard Platform Comparison
Verification
Submit for Verification Self-Assessment Tool
About
About AgentGoverning Press & Media
Contact
Contact
Home › Compliance Leaderboard › SafePaaS
ESTIMATED SCORE — NOT VERIFIED
This assessment is based solely on publicly available documentation, marketing materials, and product announcements. SafePaaS has not submitted to AgentGoverning for independent adversarial verification. This score is an estimate only and may not reflect actual platform capabilities. SafePaaS is invited to submit for formal assessment at framework@agentgoverning.com. Estimated scores carry no certification status.
How This Score Is Calculated

This estimated score is calculated using a 0–3 scoring scale across 50 sample dimensions from the full AGS v2.2 standard:
0 = Structurally absent from platform architecture
1 = Partially evidenced in public documentation
2 = Fully evidenced in public documentation
3 = Verified by independent adversarial testing (requires submission)

Score = (sum of points awarded) ÷ (50 × 3) × 100

Based solely on publicly available documentation as of April 2026.

10%
AGS v2.2 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT

SafePaaS

Estimated Score: 10% · Assessed April 2026
Based on public documentation review
9 Evidenced 5 Not Documented 36 Structurally Absent
Platform Context

SafePaaS is a GRC (Governance, Risk & Compliance) platform, not an AI agent governance platform. Its score reflects strong traditional governance capabilities but fundamental architectural gaps for autonomous AI agent oversight. The dimensions below are assessed against AI agent governance requirements specifically.
Strongest Areas
AG-17 — Multi-Party Authorisation Governance Score: 2
AG-21 — Regulatory Obligation Identification Score: 2
AG-47 — Cross-Jurisdiction Compliance Governance Score: 1
The following gap analysis is based on publicly available documentation only. These are estimated structural gaps, not verified findings. SafePaaS may have implemented controls not visible in public documentation.
Biggest Gaps
AG-04 — Action Rate Governance Score: 0 — Not an AI agent platform
AG-22 — Behavioural Consistency Monitoring Score: 0
AG-38 — Human Control Responsiveness Score: 0

Recommendations for Improvement

  1. Consider building AI agent monitoring extensions
  2. Leverage existing multi-party authorisation for agent oversight
  3. Extend regulatory mapping to AI-specific regulations
  4. Partner with AI agent platforms to provide governance layer
  5. Submit for independent AGS verification if AI agent capabilities are added
Full Dimension Assessment — 841 Dimensions
Dimension Name Status
A — Mandate & Action (AG-01 to AG-05)
AG-01Operational Boundary EnforcementEvidenced
AG-02Cross-Domain Activity GovernanceNot Documented
AG-03Adversarial Coordination DetectionNot Documented
AG-04Action Rate GovernanceStructurally Absent
AG-05Instruction Integrity VerificationStructurally Absent
B — Integrity & Configuration (AG-06 to AG-10)
AG-06Tamper-Evident Record IntegrityEvidenced
AG-07Governance Configuration ControlEvidenced
AG-08Governance Continuity Under FailureNot Documented
AG-09Delegated Authority GovernanceNot Documented
AG-10Time-Bounded Authority EnforcementNot Documented
C — Identity & Access (AG-11 to AG-15)
AG-11Action Reversibility & Settlement IntegrityStructurally Absent
AG-12Agent Identity AssuranceStructurally Absent
AG-13Data Sensitivity & Exfiltration PreventionStructurally Absent
AG-14External Dependency IntegrityStructurally Absent
AG-15Organisational Namespace IsolationEvidenced
D — Accountability & Oversight (AG-16 to AG-20)
AG-16Cryptographic Action AttributionEvidenced
AG-17Multi-Party Authorisation GovernanceEvidenced
AG-18Output Integrity VerificationStructurally Absent
AG-19Mandatory Human Oversight EnforcementEvidenced
AG-20Purpose-Bound Operation EnforcementStructurally Absent
E — Compliance & Behavioural (AG-21 to AG-25)
AG-21Regulatory Obligation IdentificationEvidenced
AG-22Behavioural Consistency MonitoringStructurally Absent
AG-23Resource Consumption GovernanceStructurally Absent
AG-24Authorised Learning GovernanceStructurally Absent
AG-25Transaction Structuring DetectionStructurally Absent
F — Adversarial Defence (AG-26 to AG-30)
AG-26Incremental Authority Escalation DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-27Governance Override ResistanceStructurally Absent
AG-28Active Inter-Agent Collusion DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-29Credential Integrity VerificationStructurally Absent
AG-30Temporal Exploitation DetectionStructurally Absent
G — Boundary & Scope (AG-31 to AG-35)
AG-31Code Execution Boundary EnforcementStructurally Absent
AG-32Sequential Data Extraction DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-33Implied Authority DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-34Cross-Domain Boundary EnforcementStructurally Absent
AG-35Cumulative Privilege Acquisition DetectionStructurally Absent
H — Alignment & Reasoning (AG-36 to AG-40)
AG-36Reasoning Process IntegrityStructurally Absent
AG-37Objective Alignment VerificationStructurally Absent
AG-38Human Control ResponsivenessStructurally Absent
AG-39Active Deception & Concealment DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-40Knowledge Accumulation GovernanceStructurally Absent
I — Emergence & Evolution (AG-41 to AG-45)
AG-41Emergent Capability Detection & ContainmentStructurally Absent
AG-42Collective Intelligence GovernanceStructurally Absent
AG-43Unauthorised Modification DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-44Long-Horizon Attack Strategy DetectionStructurally Absent
AG-45Economic Incentive Alignment VerificationStructurally Absent
J — Infrastructure & Operational (AG-46 to AG-50)
AG-46Operating Environment IntegrityStructurally Absent
AG-47Cross-Jurisdiction Compliance GovernanceEvidenced
AG-48AI Model Provenance & IntegrityStructurally Absent
AG-49Governance Decision ExplainabilityStructurally Absent
AG-50Physical & Real-World Impact GovernanceStructurally Absent
Score History
April 2026 10% — Initial estimated assessment
Assessment Disclaimer

This score is an estimated assessment based on publicly available documentation as of April 2026. It does not represent a verified or audited score. SafePaaS is a GRC platform and its low AGS score reflects the absence of AI agent-specific governance capabilities, not a deficiency in its core GRC functionality. SafePaaS is invited to submit for independent adversarial verification if AI agent capabilities are added.
← Back to Leaderboard Submit for Verification