← Back to Compliance Leaderboard
ESTIMATED SCORE — NOT VERIFIED
This assessment is based solely on publicly available documentation, marketing materials, and product announcements. SafePaaS has not submitted to AgentGoverning for independent adversarial verification. This score is an estimate only and may not reflect actual platform capabilities. SafePaaS is invited to submit for formal assessment at framework@agentgoverning.com. Estimated scores carry no certification status.
How This Score Is Calculated

This estimated score reflects publicly documented agent deployment governance capabilities assessed across 10 capability categories against the 508 Agent Audit dimensions of AGS v2.2:
• Mandate & autonomy (27 dims)
• Agent orchestration (65 dims)
• Trust & identity (30 dims)
• Detection & containment (35 dims)
• Financial controls (45 dims)
• Human oversight (7 dims)
• Memory & knowledge (18 dims)
• Sector-specific (180 dims)
• Other core governance (93 dims)
• Deployment & lifecycle (8 dims)

Each category scored 0–100% based on public documentation coverage. Overall score = weighted average across all 10 categories.

Based solely on publicly available documentation as of April 2026.

7 / 508 ESTIMATED

SafePaaS

7% estimated AGS Agent Audit compliance
Assessment: April 2026 · AGS v2.2 Agent Audit (Track 2) · Estimated (not independently verified)
ESTIMATED Agent Audit — Track 2
What This Score Means
SafePaaS is an established ERP governance platform providing SOX access controls and financial separation of duties. Its score reflects the narrow overlap between its existing financial controls framework and the AGS v2.2 Agent Audit dimensions. The platform no agent-specific architecture is evidenced in public documentation — it is an ERP governance tool, not an AI agent governance platform. Credit is given only for financial controls and authority/delegation dimensions where ERP governance tangentially applies. The majority of Agent Audit dimensions are not evidenced in public documentation for this platform..
Mandate
5%
Orchestration
0%
Trust
5%
Detection
0%
Financial
30%
Oversight
10%
Memory
0%
Sector
5%
Core
8%
Deployment
5%
Key Strengths
AG-025
Transaction Structuring Detection
SOX-compliant financial controls provide transaction structuring detection through established ERP governance mechanisms and separation of duties.
Score: 1 / 3
AG-017
Multi-Party Authorisation
Access controls provide basic multi-party authorisation through ERP role-based access and approval workflows.
Score: 1 / 3
AG-021
Regulatory Obligation Identification
Compliance framework provides basic regulatory obligation identification through SOX and financial regulatory mapping.
Score: 1 / 3
The following gap analysis is based on publicly available documentation only. These are estimated structural gaps, not verified findings. SafePaaS may have implemented controls not visible in public documentation.
Critical Gaps
AG-057
Delegation Chain Governance
No agent delegation chain governance. ERP delegation controls do not extend to AI agent delegation patterns or multi-agent orchestration.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
AG-058
Inter-Agent Trust Attestation
No inter-agent trust framework. ERP access controls do not provide agent-to-agent trust attestation or governance passport mechanisms.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
AG-059
Indirect Prompt Injection Defence
No LLM or prompt injection defence. The platform is an ERP governance tool with no AI-specific security mechanisms.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
Full Dimension Assessment
AreaStrongest CapabilitiesStatus
Strongest Documented Capabilities
FinancialERP financial controls (SOX)Evidenced
OversightAuthority and delegation (access controls)Evidenced
FinancialSeparation of dutiesEvidenced
Structurally Absent Capabilities
CoreAll agent-specific dimensionsAbsent
MandateConstitutional frameworkAbsent
DetectionRuntime containmentAbsent
OrchestrationMulti-agent orchestrationAbsent
TrustAgent identityAbsent
TrustTrust attestationAbsent
CoreLLM/agent-level controlsAbsent
CoreCryptographic sealingAbsent
CoreFederated broadcastsAbsent
MemoryMemory/RAG governanceAbsent
Sources
  • SafePaaS product documentation
  • SOX compliance page
  • Access governance documentation
Sources reviewed: April 2026.
Agent Audit Industry Average (estimated): 15% · Based on publicly documented agent deployment governance capabilities across assessed platforms. Full leaderboard →
Submit for Free Verification
Replace this estimated score with an independently verified assessment. Verification is free and adversarial.
Submit for Verification
Legal Disclaimer. This assessment is an independent estimate based on publicly available documentation and does not constitute legal, compliance, or certification advice. AgentGoverning is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SafePaaS or its affiliates. "SafePaaS" is a trademark of its respective owner. All scores are estimated and unverified. This page does not constitute a certification, endorsement, or guarantee of any kind. The assessment methodology, scoring criteria, and dimension definitions are the intellectual property of AgentGoverning and are licensed under CC BY 4.0. For formal verification, platforms must submit to independent adversarial assessment. Estimated scores may change as new documentation becomes available. AgentGoverning accepts no liability for decisions made based on estimated scores.