← Back to Compliance Leaderboard
ESTIMATED SCORE — NOT VERIFIED
This assessment is based solely on publicly available documentation, marketing materials, and product announcements. Onyx Security has not submitted to AgentGoverning for independent adversarial verification. This score is an estimate only and may not reflect actual platform capabilities. Onyx Security is invited to submit for formal assessment at framework@agentgoverning.com. Estimated scores carry no certification status.
How This Score Is Calculated

This estimated score reflects publicly documented agent deployment governance capabilities assessed across 10 capability categories against the 508 Agent Audit dimensions of AGS v2.2:
• Mandate & autonomy (27 dims)
• Agent orchestration (65 dims)
• Trust & identity (30 dims)
• Detection & containment (35 dims)
• Financial controls (45 dims)
• Human oversight (7 dims)
• Memory & knowledge (18 dims)
• Sector-specific (180 dims)
• Other core governance (93 dims)
• Deployment & lifecycle (8 dims)

Each category scored 0–100% based on public documentation coverage. Overall score = weighted average across all 10 categories.

Based solely on publicly available documentation as of April 2026.

14 / 508 ESTIMATED

Onyx Security

14% estimated AGS Agent Audit compliance
Assessment: April 2026 · AGS v2.2 Agent Audit (Track 2) · Estimated (not independently verified)
ESTIMATED Agent Audit — Track 2
What This Score Means
Onyx Security's Guardian Agent supervisory layer provides genuine runtime intervention capability that scores well on detection and containment dimensions (~40% of those 35 dimensions). However, Onyx is positioned as a security product rather than a governance platform based on its public documentation. It monitors agent behaviour for threats and vulnerabilities rather than governing agent behaviour as an autonomous entity. Financial controls, mandate enforcement, multi-agent orchestration governance, memory/RAG governance, and all sector-specific agent governance dimensions are outside its documented scope. The majority of Agent Audit dimensions are not evidenced in public documentation for this platform..
Mandate
15%
Orchestration
5%
Trust
10%
Detection
40%
Financial
5%
Oversight
15%
Memory
5%
Sector
12%
Core
15%
Deployment
5%
Key Strengths
AG-039
Deception Detection
Guardian Agent supervisory layer provides genuine runtime deception detection capability, monitoring agent outputs for deceptive or misleading patterns.
Score: 2 / 3
AG-022
Behavioural Monitoring
Strong behavioural boundary monitoring with runtime anomaly detection and intervention capabilities for deployed agents.
Score: 2 / 3
AG-003
Adversarial Coordination Detection
Basic adversarial coordination detection through security-focused monitoring of agent interaction patterns.
Score: 1 / 3
The following gap analysis is based on publicly available documentation only. These are estimated structural gaps, not verified findings. Onyx Security may have implemented controls not visible in public documentation.
Critical Gaps
AG-057
Delegation Chain Governance
No delegation chain governance. Tracking or governance of how authority is delegated between agents in multi-agent systems is not evidenced in public documentation.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
AG-058
Inter-Agent Trust Attestation
No inter-agent trust handshake or attestation framework. Security monitoring does not extend to governance-level trust between agents.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
AG-784
Adaptive Threat Response
No adaptive threat response framework specifically designed for agent-level governance threats as opposed to traditional cybersecurity threats.
Score: 0 / 3 — Structurally Absent
Full Dimension Assessment
AreaStrongest CapabilitiesStatus
Strongest Documented Capabilities
DetectionBehavioural boundary monitoringEvidenced
DetectionCybersecurity threat detectionEvidenced
DetectionRuntime interventionEvidenced
DetectionSafety-critical anomaly detectionEvidenced
Structurally Absent Capabilities
MandateMandate enforcementAbsent
OrchestrationMulti-agent orchestrationAbsent
OrchestrationDelegation chainsAbsent
TrustTrust attestationAbsent
TrustGovernance passportsAbsent
OversightGraduated autonomyAbsent
FinancialFinancial crime governanceAbsent
MemoryMemory/RAG governanceAbsent
CoreCryptographic sealingAbsent
CoreFederated broadcastsAbsent
SectorSector-specific governanceAbsent
Sources
  • Onyx Security platform documentation
  • onyx.security/platform
  • Guardian Agent architecture
  • March 2026 launch documentation
Sources reviewed: April 2026.
Agent Audit Industry Average (estimated): 15% · Based on publicly documented agent deployment governance capabilities across assessed platforms. Full leaderboard →
Submit for Free Verification
Replace this estimated score with an independently verified assessment. Verification is free and adversarial.
Submit for Verification
Legal Disclaimer. This assessment is an independent estimate based on publicly available documentation and does not constitute legal, compliance, or certification advice. AgentGoverning is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Onyx Security or its affiliates. "Onyx Security" and "Guardian Agent" are trademarks of their respective owners. All scores are estimated and unverified. This page does not constitute a certification, endorsement, or guarantee of any kind. The assessment methodology, scoring criteria, and dimension definitions are the intellectual property of AgentGoverning and are licensed under CC BY 4.0. For formal verification, platforms must submit to independent adversarial assessment. Estimated scores may change as new documentation becomes available. AgentGoverning accepts no liability for decisions made based on estimated scores.